Personal point
I can show sentiment without
impairment of my judgement.
The way you perceive things, events, factors, has to be based upon a personal structure of events: or one must have transcended, at least Spiritually, the environment. In which case there has to be a perceptual knowledge of the environment in which the Spirit finds "itself ."
Education of Being is when a person knows this transcendence. Spiritual Beingness must transcend and give back. The Priesthood is the Beingness giving back and Being-in-the-World as an existential factor.
Clearing Yourself
When someone is not content in the 'Environment'
Then one should change it.
Either by doing their share or by excusing themselves from the situation.
Remember Environment takes into consideration
EVERY factor.
Then is every factor contributing
or, what is their input?
Do a list of good or not for each person,
for each factor;
1 - 100 - 1000 ?
Then do a list of your"Self," realistically.
- - -
Enviornments are a blend of many factors
Economic - Social - Cultural
Every Enviornment has factors and you are
one factor in everything you see,
You thought that it was only your world?
We are able to express our understandings in a language (words) which does not contain many Being-in-the-world terms except by hyphenating them to imply a state of existence within yet beyond the constructs of everyday language. Other groups, languages do have these distinctions. We are able to do this because one's internal comprehension isn't only tied to conceptual structures of existence but to the perceptual as well.
Perceptual awareness is the first thing all of us enter into. Watch babies as they grow. Words have been looked upon as the development of a higher state of the growth process. "Baby said a word!" Everybody feels good about this. But the spirit is beginning to express itself to others who are perceived in the immediate environment. It is an expression of the comprehension of a multifaceted input perceived by its Beingness.
Beyond and before words, Spirit existed and began it's voyage through time and Space.
What will I leave behind?
Nothing, because the concept
of "behind"
could be a false consideration
Since everything that was and
still is in some form
has at its constant a
sense of now-ness,
both then and now,
So how can I say
What I've left behind
because seen or not seen,
all things in existence
are
Somewhere, someplace,
Here
Now
But I think we share something, a sense of Being